Home » Articles posted by Yonason Goldson (Page 51)

Author Archives: Yonason Goldson

Proverbial Beauty Available NOW on Amazon

PB Front CoverMy new book, Proverbial Beauty: Secrets for Success and Happiness from the Wisdom of the Ages, is spotlighted today on Celtic Lady’s Reviews and is now available on Amazon.com.

Take a look, and tell a friend.

The Art of Moving Forward

motion

All around us is deception.  Activity masquerades as action.  Desire masquerades as direction.  Preoccupation masquerades as love.

The Hebrew word yoda means knowledge.  It also means intimacy.

Without knowledge, there can be no intimacy.  Without closeness, there can be no knowledge.  Without trust, there can be no closeness.  

Proverbial Beauty

Speak Truth to Powers

9k=How refreshing that there are people like Kirsten Powers in the world.

In her new book, the outspoken, unapologetic liberal Democrat has taken aim at the militant search-and-destroy tactics employed by many liberals to shut down civil discourse and bully ideological opponents into submission.

Not surprisingly, many on the left have turned their attacks upon Ms. Powers and her book, proving her point by doing exactly what she accuses them of doing.

The intellectual laziness of groupthink lies at the heart of the deep divisions that are tearing this country apart.  If more people would listen — listen to each other, and listen to Ms. Powers’s message — America might start turning back toward a culture of problem-solving and away from character assassination and political dogma.

The Answer is in the Stars

roll-over-and-look-at-the-starsFrom Symmetry Magazine:

According to theory, the big bang should have created matter and antimatter in equal amounts. When matter and antimatter meet, they annihilate, leaving nothing but energy behind. So in principle, none of us should exist.

But we do. And as far as physicists can tell, it’s only because, in the end, there was one extra matter particle for every billion matter-antimatter pairs. Physicists are hard at work trying to explain this asymmetry.

Here’s a nice follow up to yesterday’s post, Embrace Mystery and Discover Joy.  Scientists love to tell us how they’ve decoded the secrets of the universe.  Then they tell us that we shouldn’t even exist.

“The universe is not only queerer than we suppose, but queerer than we can suppose.”

~J.B.S. Haldane

 

Embrace the Unknown and Discover Joy

Mystery-BoxQuestion #1: You’re at an auction.  Item #12 is a set of six glass goblets.  Item #13 is a mystery set of either four or six glass goblets… you’ll only find out once the bidding is over. Which item is likely to go for a higher price? Needless to say, you would be willing to pay more when they know you’re getting six goblets than you would if you might end up with only four.

Question #2: You’re working at a job for which you will be paid $20. The person next to you is doing the identical job, but doesn’t know whether he will be paid $10 or $20. Who is going to work harder? Needless to say, you will, since you know that you’ll be paid at least as much and maybe twice as much as the other guy.

But guess what? Research shows just the opposite.

Click here to read the whole article.

How will we survive the drone culture?

I haven’t read this entire excerpt, but the rise of the drone raises more questions than the obvious ones concerning basic morality and “rules of engagement.”

patton-620x349At the end of the movie classic “Patton,” the general responds to a reporter’s question about the “wonder weapons” of the coming era:

Wonder weapons? By G-d, I don’t see the wonder in them. Killing without heroics? Nothing is glorified? Nothing is reaffirmed? No heroes, no cowards, no troops, no… generals. Only those who are left alive, and those who are left… dead. I’m glad I won’t live to see it.”

The message here is not the glorification of warfare.  What Patton understood is that conflict brings out the true essence of a person.  Cowards are revealed as cowards, providing the opportunity for reappraisal.  Heroes are not merely revealed… they are created through their engagement on the field of combat.  The heat of battle requires them to tap into unrealized potential.

This doesn’t require a battlefield of armies.  It does require that we take up arms against our lesser selves and strive to conquer our baser impulses and inclinations.  It demands that we grapple with the complex issues of good and evil and not take refuge in political slogans or groupthink.

In a culture of automation, we have a harder fight not to become automatons ourselves.  We can comfortably join the army of drones, or we can meet the challenge, rise to the occasion, and emerge victorious as heroes.

Collateral Damage from the Grievance Industry

In a deeply insightful column, Thomas Sowell offers an observation that should be obvious to everyone:

images“[C]ommunities scattered across the country were disrupted by riots and looting because of the demonstrable lie that Michael Brown was shot in the back by a white policeman in Missouri — but there was not nearly as much turmoil created by the demonstrable fact that a fleeing black man was shot dead by a white policeman in South Carolina.”  (Emphasis added.)

Mr. Sowell goes on to make the point that the grievance industry cares about neither truth nor justice.  A guilty white cop indicted for killing an innocent black man isn’t newsworthy; an innocent white cop exonerated for killing a black criminal is cause for moral outrage.

And this is what is all comes down to:  self-serving leaders and rabblerousers want outrage.  They want to rail against the unfairness of it all, against the gap between rich and poor, against the indignity of stop-and-frisk, against the “legacy of slavery.”  What they don’t want is to search for solutions, much less find them.  That would mean an end to the victim-culture that has allowed them to exploit the disadvantages of their own brethren for their own profit and power.

“In a world where the truth means so little, and headstrong preconceptions seem to be all that matter, what hope is there for rational words or rational behavior, much less mutual understanding across racial lines?”

Let’s hope Mr. Sowell’s lament isn’t the sad epitaph for any hope of achieving, or restoring, a civil society.

Remembering the Boston Bombing

After the sentencing of Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev last week, I’m revisiting some thoughts from the days after the 2013 bombing:

167108054-5401Zebadiah Carter describes himself living in “an era when homicide kills more people than cancer and the favorite form of suicide is to take a rifle up some tower and keep shooting until the riot squad settles it.” In 1980, this remark by the main character in a Robert Heinlein novel sounded like the science fiction that it was. Now it echoes like a prophecy.

Random acts of mass violence in the United States still horrify us but no longer shock us. We’ve heard too many stories, seen too many pictures. And too many of them are depressingly the same:

  • 20 students and 6 adults murdered at Sandy Hook Elementary School.
  • 12 killed and 58 wounded at the Century Theater in Aurora, Colorado.
  • 13 killed and 30 wounded at Fort Hood.
  • 32 dead and 17 wounded in the Virginia Tech massacre.

And those are only the bloodiest atrocities going back to 2007. The Columbine school shooting in 1999 adds another 39 victims to the tally. And, of course, Timothy McVeigh’s bombing of the Federal Building in Oklahoma City in 1995 claimed 168 lives and injured nearly 700.

Now we have to try and make sense of this latest act of senselessness — the Boston Marathon bombings, which shattered an iconic American institution and shook our already precarious sense of order and security.

Amidst all the suffering and all the investigation, the question we most want answered is why?

We’ve asked the same question before. According to reports, Adam Lanza was bullied as a student at Sandy Hook; Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold were bullied at Columbine High School; so was Timothy McVeigh as a boy in Pendleton, New York. There were also histories of psychiatric problems, as there were with Seung-Hui Cho before his attack on Virginia Tech, James Eagan Holmes before Aurora, and Nidal Malik Hasan before Fort Hood.

But these explanations offer little in the way of real answers. Almost all of us were bullied when we were younger without seeking murderous retribution against our tormentors, and most of us can lay claim to at least some kind of neurosis. More to the point, why is random violence on the rise, if the root causes have been around for generations? According to data assembled by Mother Jones Magazine, nearly 40% of mass shootings since 1982 have taken place in the last seven years (excluding robberies and gang-related incidents). If so, what has changed? And can we expect it to get worse?

Ultimately, it may be all about control. “These kids often feel powerless,” psychiatrist Peter Langman told LiveScience. “The one way they can feel like they’re somebody is to get a gun and kill people.”

“Out of control” is a term that seems increasingly characteristic of the world we live in. On the one hand, technology provides us with the power of information, opportunity, and access at a level unimaginable barely a decade ago. But on the other hand, our inability to manipulate so much power leaves us feeling both frustrated and inadequate, while the triumphs of others make us feel like pawns in a game we can never win. With the world at our fingertips, success and happiness remain damnably elusive.

clip_image0028And so we flail about with increasing desperation, constantly trying to push ourselves just a little harder and work just a little faster. Day by day, our sense of anger and resentment toward a society that promises so much and delivers so little builds within us until we feel ready to explode. In a world gone mad, what else can we do but get mad at the world?

The fallacy, however, is the world has not made sense since the beginning of time. So observed King Solomon, the wisest of all men, in his Book of Ecclesiastes, compiled over a lifetime spent searching for meaning and justice:

And I returned and saw under the sun that the race is not to the swift nor the battle to the strong, neither is there bread to the wise, nor riches to men of understanding, nor yet favor to men of knowledge; but time and death will overcome them all.

Really, all that has changed is our expectation. We have been taught to believe that anything we desire is within our grasp, that we are entitled to the love of poets, the wealth of kings, the pleasures and the power of the gods. Our culture has etched upon our collective consciousness the inalienable right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. And although Thomas Jefferson had the wisdom not to assert the right to happiness itself, that subtle distinction is lost on most of our generation.

Given the fantasy images of Pixar and Dreamworks, the superhero illusions of the silver screen, and the miracle gadgets that fit in the palm of our hands, what can we expect from a youth wholly unprepared for reaching the age of responsibility? And when they confront the seeming impossibility of leaving their mark on the world through any positive contribution, why should we be surprised when they choose violence as their final recourse to make the world take notice of their existence?

And yet, for all that, Solomon himself did not give in to despair and hopelessness, despite the words of lamentation with which he begins Ecclesiastes:

Futility of futilities — all is futile!

But it is not Solomon’s opening words that contain his ultimate message. It is the words he offers at the end, in sharp contrast to all the observations he offers before:

The sum of the matter, when all is heard: Fear the Divine and keep His commandments, for this is the entirety of Man.

Viewed superficially, this world is a place of chaos, without rhyme or reason, without justice or pity. Says Solomon: do not look at the outer trappings of creation, but search for the nobility of man. Recognize the greatness that compels a 27 year old first grade teacher, with scarcely a moment’s notice, to give up her life in the protection of her innocent charges. Admire the reflexive heroism of bystanders who rushed to help the injured at the finish line, without regard for whether another explosion might make them victims themselves. Do not lose hope in the face of wanton violence, but take inspiration from the lofty heights to which Man can rise.

In the marathon of life, some finish and some fall. But greatness is measured by perseverance, by pursuing the unique potential that resides within each of us us, by our determination to choose good over evil and show the world that the divine spark of the human spirit will never die.

Originally published by Jewish World Review.

What’s in a Name? Everything!

A name is not merely a label; it is an expression of the thing itself.

For instance, in Hebrew a donkey is a chamor.  A variant form of the same word, chomer, means “mortar,” the cement used in laying bricks.  And so the animal most characterized by its stubbornness is called by a name that also connotes “thickness.”  The dog, known for its loyalty, is called a kelev, which can also be read as k’lev, which means “of the heart.”  Names can provide insights into the nature of the world, if we know how to interpret them…

The meaning of a name can offer an insight into one’s intrinsic character.  The name David means “beloved,” suggesting the capacity to form deep emotional bonds.  The name Deborah means “bee,” suggesting an industrious nature as well as a personality that can both sting and sweeten.  The name Abigail means, “source of joy,” suggesting a talent for providing happiness to others.  Awareness of our innate, individual abilities can motivate us to develop potential that would otherwise remain dormant deep within us.

Read the whole article here.

 

Don Draper and the Illusion of Influence

Mad Men is coming to an end, concluding a luminescent seven-season run that began in 2007.  But the show was into its third season before I first heard the name Don Draper.

I guess that proves hopelessly I’m out of touch with contemporary culture — a term that has increasingly become an oxymoron.

imgresNonetheless, I can’t say that I was embarrassed in 2009 to have never heard of the personality voted Most Influential Man in America. What mortified me far more was to find myself living in a society that could consider a fictional character to be its most significant public figure.

I had to strain my memory to place that year’s first runner-up, track star Usain Bolt. I’m still straining my powers of reason to comprehend why a Jamaican sprinter should have been considered the most influential real person in United States.

Number three on the list was President Barack Obama. I had heard of him, and it’s hard to argue that the president is not supremely influential in his own country, no matter what one may think of his policies.

The rankings lay in the hands of readers polled annually by AskMen.com, a website (of which I had also never heard) devoted to men and their lifestyles. Topping the list as well were, in order: Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, American Idol judge Simon Cowell, late pop star Michael Jackson, Apple CEO Steve Jobs, tennis champion Roger Federer, quarterback Peyton Manning, and Ultimate Fighting Championship president Dana White.

But grabbing the most votes was Don Draper, lead character in the Emmy-winning drama Mad Men. And for the first time in the poll’s history, the most influential man in American does not actually exist.

According to Reuters, AskMen.com editor-in-chief James Bassil explained the vote this way: “One of the big themes this year was that men really want to take on these traditional roles — as fathers, working men, provider at home, leader at the office. I think they are yearning for what is a solid past.”

That would be a comforting thought … if it were actually true. Indeed, one wonders if Mr. Bassil has watched the show or read his own magazine.

The AskMen.com website had this to say: “[Draper is] a postwar archetype, both a brilliant career man and a temptation-swayed philanderer who sincerely wants to be a family man… permanently conflicted over how to reconcile his morals and his desires.” The website for Mad Men describes the show as a “sexy, stylized and provocative drama [that] follows the lives of the ruthlessly competitive men and women of Madison Avenue advertising, an ego-driven world where key players make an art of the sell.”

Were that not enough to debunk Mr. Bassil’s rose-colored analysis, the list of the top ten winners is more than enough. Celebrities, athletes, billionaire businessmen, and an ideologically far-left president hardly reflect a trend back toward traditional values.

imgresIn truth, the evidence suggests just the opposite, that Americans are increasingly obsessed with glitz and glamour, with power and wealth, with conquest and ego-gratification. The sad moral of the story was that the poll-winners are genuinely influential in steering our society toward superficial hopes and unrealistic dreams. How fitting that the most influential man was not only a fictional character, but a profoundly flawed and ambivalent one at that.

The bright side of the story, however, is that the poll revealed the attitudes and aspirations not of Americans as a whole but of AskMen.com readers. If the publication is anything like its forerunners, Playboy and GQ, it is hardly a fair representation of the country. Indeed, it would seem to say more about the inner conflict of testosterone-driven alpha males than those typical family men who may already be living — not merely yearning for — traditional values.

I never have watched the show, so I can’t comment on where the main character’s ambivalence has led him over the years.  But it seems a good bet that those acolytes of Don Draper (and his real-world alter-egos) are likely to end up leading similarly conflicted lives, following him into the oblivion of the world of illusion.

Whereas those who live their lives according to traditional values understand that it is those very values that teach us the difference between good and evil, between truth and falsehood, between reality and illusion.  Without the fantasy of Hollywood or the glamour of Madison Avenue, theirs are the lives of real substance and enduring reward.