Home » Posts tagged 'Conflict' (Page 6)

Tag Archives: Conflict

Memorial Day

Video – What are Ethics? Part 19: No Hiding from Reality

Video — What are Ethics? The Lessons of Ransomware

Tapping the Power of Hidden Potential

From this week’s Jewish World Review

A mutated spider bites Peter Parker and transforms him into Spiderman.  Steve Rogers receives and injection of super-soldier serum and develops into Captain America.  David Banner doses himself with gamma rays and mutates into the Incredible Hulk.

These are the fantastic tales of American comic book culture, in which ordinary people find themselves suddenly endowed with extraordinary powers and thrust, willingly or unwillingly, into the role of heroes.  Indeed, who among us hasn’t fantasized about acquiring superpowers and using them to conquer his personal demons or to save the world?

But what if it weren’t a fantasy?

In 2006, Derek Amato dove into the shallow end of a swimming pool and stuck his head against the concrete bottom.  The resulting concussion left him with chronic headaches and sensitivity to light, it also turned him into a musical virtuoso.  Lacking either musical training or the ability to read music, Mr. Amato’s fingers dance over a keyboard like Mikhail Baryshnikov on a stage.  He doesn’t know how he does it, but his life has been utterly transformed.

His case is not unique.  After suffering a head injury in a childhood fall, Alonzo Clemens began producing exceptionally lifelike clay sculptures.  A 10-year-old boy knocked unconscious by a baseball acquired the ability to do calendar calculations: he now remembers every detail of every minute of his life.  A 58-year-old builder became an artist and poet in the wake of a stroke.  A teenage boy woke up speaking fluent Spanish after he was hit in the head by a soccer ball.

Examples of acquired-savant, or accidental genius, go on and on.  Who knows what potential for greatness lies within every one of us?

ILLUMINATING THE DARKNESS

One of the most compelling episodes from Jewish history is the story of Rabbi Akiva.  He was an illiterate shepherd, content with his life as a simple laborer until his wife Rachel recognized his potential for greatness.  At her urging, the 40-year-old Akiva found a kindergarten teacher to instruct him in the Hebrew aleph-beis so that he might learn to read and study.

But Akiva’s adult brain found the challenge of childhood learning too formidable a task.  Dispirited over his failure, he was ready to abandon his efforts.  But then he came upon a large stone marred by a curious indentation.  When he inquired where the hollow in the stone had come from, he was told that the steady dripping of water over time had worn away the solid rock.

“If water can make an impression on stone,” he said to himself, “then surely the wisdom of the ages can make an impression on me.”

With that, he returned to his studies.  Over the course of the next 24 years, he developed into the greatest sage in the history of his people, second only to Moses the Lawgiver.

TRIAL AND ERROR

But Rabbi Akiva’s life was not without hardship.  He witnessed the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem and the bloody suppression of the Bar Kochba rebellion against the Roman Empire.  Worst of all, he saw the apparent undoing of all he had accomplished with the death of his many students.

At the height of his career, Rabbi Akiva oversaw an academy of 24,000 talmudists, a generation of scholars virtually unparalleled in their intellectual prowess.  But something went wrong.  For all their brilliance and erudition, these students somehow failed to fully absorb Rabbi Akiva’s fundamental lesson to love one’s fellow as oneself.  They were not openly uncivil.  But their academic accomplishment infected them with a whisper of overconfidence, which ever-so-slightly eroded the respect they showed for one another.

For such exceptional students, blessed with the greatest of teachers, this tiny flaw proved fatal.  A mysterious plague began killing them off in horrifying numbers, and the survivors refused to look within themselves toward self-improvement until they too succumbed.  Over the course of seven weeks, the entire academy was wiped out, and the light of its wisdom extinguished.

Rabbi Akiva might have mourned his failure and retreated into despondency.  But the same resolution that drove him forward decades earlier steeled him in the face of tragedy.  He renewed his efforts and, with a handful of disciples, rebuilt all that was lost and secured the future of the Jewish people.

One of his protégés was Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai, whose life and accomplishments were celebrated this week with the Jewish holiday of Lag B’Omer.  Building upon his teacher’s wisdom, he brought a new light of inspiration into the world, dispelling the suffering and confusion of exile by revealing the divine wisdom of eternity with a radiance that has inspired the Jewish people for nearly 2000 years.

THE LIGHT OF PERSEVERANCE

Heroism is not solely the stuff of comic books or legend.  If a blow to the head can actualize hidden talents and abilities, what does that tell us about the potential that lies dormant within every human mind and heart?  We may never become Vincent Van Gogh or Itzhak Perlman, but with persistence and determination any one of us can unlock talents and abilities we never imagined we might have.

In a way, the impatient, unfocused predisposition of contemporary culture might work to our benefit.  In a world where everyone thrives on instant and effortless gratification, the competition for genuine achievement grows less and less.  If 90% of life is just showing up, the advantage of those who truly apply themselves grows exponential.

The real measure of success is not money, fame, or power.  It lies in self-respect, and in the respect we earn from people of quality who still recognize the virtues of discipline, refinement, and integrity.  Pursue those values with sincerity, and every other blessing will follow.

Read more articles at Jewish World Review

Patience and Power

Video — What are Ethics? Part 17: The Shame of Public Shaming

A Short History of Hazing

“I expect to lose half of you before I’m finished. I will use every means necessary — fair and unfair — to trip you up, to expose your weaknesses.”

This line sets the tone for Louis Gossett, Jr.’s, Academy Award winning role as Gunnery Sergeant Emil Foley in An Officer and a Gentlemen. It’s also a fairly accurate depiction of the drill sergeants address military recruits — especially those training for elite corps.

The philosophy is simple. An army is a team. Every soldier’s life depends on his ability and the ability of his comrades to carry out orders. There is no room for hesitation in battle, no latitude for second-guessing orders, no accommodation for individual objectives or priorities.

In other words, there is no allowance for ego.

Right on the Left

To quote one of history’s most conflicted figures, let me be perfectly clear:

I am no fan of Bill Maher. And that is precisely the point.

No doubt he would deny it to the death, but the toxic talk show host has much in common with his own favorite target of righteous condemnation, Donald Trump.

Mr. Maher is arrogant, opinionated, abrasive, belittling, ill-informed about positions he opposes, and indifferent to nuance. He subscribes to a black-and-white worldview that disdains and denigrates anyone with whom he disagrees. For him, there are only two ways to look at the world: his way and the way of morons.

If the online quotes attributed to him are accurate, Bill Maher defines faith as the purposeful suspension of critical thinking – implying that there is no such thing as reasoned belief and that only the religious suffer from self-delusion.

He:

Equates the 9/11 terrorists with churchgoers

Calls religion a neurological disorder

Fails to recognize that political dogma on both sides of the aisle can be as virulent as the most zealous religious dogma.

So what is my point? Simply this: however much I may despise the man and virtually everything he believes, it’s only fair to acknowledge when he’s right.

Footnotes

A brief time out from all the heavy stuff.  From this month’s issue of The Wagon Magazine.

Impressions,
Through a scarlet haze,
And shockwaves,
From each passing phase
Take flight, take wing,
Pretend to sing,
But truly,
They don’t mean a thing.

Insight,
Hindsight,
I-don’t-mind-sight;
Can you see to find the way
That carries us from day to day —
Or is there none?
What’s done is done.
The die is cast.
All’s lost
Or won.

Academic ignorance
Of symbiotic circumstance
Entailing only random chance
Is such a shame.
A formula less erudite
Perhaps could have success despite
Evidence not to the contrary.
But tell me:  who’s to blame?

There was a time,
That waxed sublime,
A moment bought
Without a thought,
But that was then.
So when again,
As shadows fall,
Do we begin?

Confusion,
Self-delusion,
Slightly frightful inobtrusion
All askew,
Are only footnotes on a page,
Wild beasts within a cage,
When I’m with you.

The Science of Fake News

Thousands gathered on the grounds of the Washington Monument this past Saturday for the “March on Science.” What were they advocating? Well, in a word… science.

What can we expect next? Doctors for Hospitals? Lawyers for Jurisprudence? Mammals for Oxygen?

To be fair, there is a real issue here. Namely, the exploitation of science for political advantage. In a perfect world, scientific data would be apolitical, serving as a nonpartisan lodestone for guiding public policy. Facts are facts, and the only debate should be about what they mean, not what they are.

But our world is far from perfect, and the problem is not that we don’t have faith in science. It’s that many have found good reason to lose faith in scientists.

Case in point.  Last February, John Bates, formerly of the National Climatic Data Center, charged that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association had manipulated global warming data to advance a political agenda.  So here’s the question:  if climate change poses as grave a danger as scientists say it does, why do they have to fudge the data to prove it?

HOW TRUE ARE THE FACTS?

The arrogance of scientists is evident nowhere more than in their zealotry against religion.  Every thinking person knows that the world came into existence through Big Bang and that life developed through evolution.  Anyone who questions these axioms is living in a world of denial and delusion.

Right?

Not necessarily.  More than a few members of the scientific community are uncomfortable with their colleagues’ blind worship before the altar of science.

If you ask a professor of physics what existed before the Big Bang, you’re likely to hear that Big Bang created time as well as space. Since there was no time before the Big Bang, the question is “scientifically irrelevant.”

Writes Bob Berman in Astronomy Magazine, the truth is that “nobody has the foggiest idea what happened the Tuesday before the Big Bang.”  So why not simply say so?

Evolutionary theory – or, perhaps more accurately, evolutionary hypothesis – is riddled with unanswered questions.  The first premise is spontaneous generation, the appearance of life where there was none.  According to science, this is impossible.

So how did life begin?  In 1954, Nobel Laureate George Wald of Harvard wrote in Scientific American:  “One has only to contemplate the magnitude of this task to concede that the spontaneous generation of a living organism is impossible. Yet here we are – as a result, I believe, of spontaneous generation.”  Dr. Wald then went on to clarify his definition of “impossible.”

It gets worse.  There’s the dearth of fossil evidence.  Dr. Gerald Schroeder points out that wings, for example, appear fully formed in the fossil record.  There should be countless examples of macroevolution – intermediate stages of change from one species to another.  Evolutionists love pointing to apteryx, a prehistoric flightless bird with hairy feathers, as one such intermediary link.  So here is one piece of evidence where they should have hundreds.  Where are the rest?

Yet another problem is exemplified by bats, which have echolocation — they navigate by sound.  To do that, observed the late Michael Crichton, they would have had to develop simultaneously specialized vocal apparatus to make sounds, specialized ears to hear echoes, specialized brains to interpret the sounds, and specialized bodies to dive and swoop to catch insects.  Without any one of these, the other three are worthless.  How did evolution “know” to bring about all four faculties at once?

Returning to the cosmos, we have to deal with the expansion of the universe – which is accelerating, in contradiction to the laws of physics.  How does science explain that one?  Again, Bob Berman provides the answer:  “It’s not galaxy clusters that travel outward,” the professor will say pedantically, “but space itself that grows larger. The galaxies don’t actually move.”  So here I am thinking, wait a minute. Are we at a Daffy Duck convention?

SO MANY QUESTIONS

Educated adherents of religion feel no need to reject evolution or Big Bang completely.  But it’s difficult to take seriously scientists who demonstrate such utter certitude in the face of unrelenting mystery.  Why aren’t there more scientists as honest as Harry Cliff?  Unlike so many, the particle physicist with CERN is unafraid to observe that “maybe for the first time in the history of science, we could be facing questions that we cannot answer, not because we don’t have the brains or technology, but because the laws of physics themselves forbid it.”

So when it comes to climate change and other matters that may affect the future of mankind, perhaps the scientific community should consider how much their own hubris has damaged their credibility before they blame the public for questioning their conclusions.

The Talmud teaches:  One who speculates upon these four things – what is above, what is below, what is before, and what is after – would be better off never having been born.

This does not mean that we are forbidden to ponder the vastness of Creation and the mysteries of the universe.  Rather, it cautions us that, as J.B.S. Haladane observed, the universe is not only queerer than we suppose, but queerer than we can suppose.

We would all do well to remember that there will always be more for us to know, that the truth may not be what we want it to be, and that humility is the first step toward wisdom.

Published in Jewish World Review.