Home » Posts tagged 'Good and Evil' (Page 16)

Tag Archives: Good and Evil

A Short History of Mideast Violence

e6eECSeemingly without end, political groups, government officials, and media outlets continue to blame Israel for unrest in the Mideast.  At best, they lament the “cycle of violence,” suggesting that both sides are equally to blame.

With so many outlets providing platforms for misinformation, it’s no surprise how many people believe that Israel is at fault for denying the rights of the Palestinian people to live peacefully in the land that has been theirs since time immemorial.

However, as New York Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan used to say:  “You’re entitled to your own opinions, but you’re not entitled to your own facts.”

So here are the facts.

Before 1920, even the concept of a Palestinian people did not exist.  Arabs living in the region considered themselves part of greater Syria, until the French and British divided the region and ended hope of a single commonwealth.  Only then, in a desperate attempt to create a national identity out of whole cloth, local Arabs proclaimed themselves Palestinians and begin lobbying for a country of their own.

And they got what they wanted.  The next year, Colonial Secretary Winston Churchill divided the region into what are now Jordan and Israel.  The Arabs received 76% of the land.  The rest was reserved as a Jewish homeland.

But even that was not enough.  In 1947, the United Nations divided the remaining territory roughly in half, leaving Israel with 13% of the original Mandate.  The Jews accepted the compromise.  The Arabs launched a war against the Jews.

Between 540,000 and 720,000 Arabs fled Israel, encouraged by leaders who promised that they would return to their homes after the Jews had been pushed into the sea.  Over 70 years later, about 5 million Arab refugees remain, many in squalid camps, unsettled by their own people because of their value as a bargaining chip to demand repatriation or restitution that Israel cannot afford to give.

All the way back in October, 1949, Egyptian Foreign Minister Muhammad Salah A-Din told the Cairo journal Al-Masri that, “In demanding the return of the Palestinian refugees, the Arabs mean their return as masters, not slaves; or, to put it quite clearly — the intention is the termination of Israel.”

You can’t make peace with people who don’t want peace.  On, 11 Dec 1948, the UN passed Resolution 194, frequently invoked by Arab leaders b/c it calls for repatriation of (or compensation for) all refugees (Article 11).  Every Arab country voted against the resolution, which also guarantees access to holy sites (Article 7) and calls for commitment to peace.

Of course, no one ever mentions the 860,000 Jews who fled for safety from Arab lands at the same time, resettled by Israel without ever receiving restitution from the Arab countries that expropriated their homes and property.

UN_General_Assembly_hallWe also don’t hear how, in 1949, Israel agreed to repatriate 100,000 Arabs as part of a peace negotiation; 35,000 were allowed to return, until repatriation was halted b/c of Arab refusal to make any compromises toward peace.  In early 1950, the UN General Assembly established the United Nations Relief and Works Agency, with an annual budget of $54 million.  Arab governments refused to cooperate.  In 1959, only $7 million had been used while another $28 million lay available in a fund that was never used.

In fact, as early as 1960 King Hussein of Jordan admitted that “Arab leaders have approached the Palestine problem in an irresponsible manner… they have used the Palestine people for selfish political purposes.  This is ridiculous and, I could say, even criminal.”

Khaled al-’Azm (Prime Minister of Syria 1948-49) wrote in his memoirs in 1973: “We have brought destruction upon a million Arab refugees, by calling upon them and pleading with them to leave their lands, their homes, their work and their business, and we have caused them to be barren and unemployed though each one of them had been working and qualified in a trade from which he could make a living.”

But the strategy of Arab leaders has always been to use the refugees as a pretext to reject peace in pursuit of their ultimate objective:  genocide.  Even after getting 87% of the mandatory territory in 1920 and 1947, they still rejected the UN partition, then tried to exterminate Israeli Jews in 1947, 1967, 1973, and have continued terror attacks until today.

By rejecting peace and inciting bloody uprisings, Arab leaders have condemned their own people to lives of poverty and violence.  For years, families of suicide murderers were paid tens of thousands of dollars to encourage their “martyrdom.” Murders of Jews are celebrated and their perpetrators turned into heroes by naming streets and schools after them.  Yasir Arafat, founder of the Palestinian Liberation Organization (which was established in 1964, three years before Israel had control of the West Bank region, Gaza, or the Golan Heights), embezzled billions of dollars that could have helped his own people.

There are many Palestinians who truly want peace, but any suspected of disloyalty to the power structure and the status quo are executed as sympathizers or collaborators, or else have their families threatened if they don’t “prove” themselves.  And Palestinian children grow up in schools that teach hatred of and victimization by Israel, attend paramilitary camps that train them to kill Jews, and learn that the Holocaust is a myth fabricated by Jewish sympathizers in the Western World.

But facts don’t matter.  Instead, again and again, Israel is smeared with the same slanderous refrain:  occupation, oppression, expansion, apartheid.  It doesn’t matter that Israeli Arabs enjoy greater prosperity, literacy, and life expectancy than the Arabs in the surrounding countries.  Not to mention freedom.  Just as it doesn’t matter that Israeli Arabs have been represented in every walk of life, including an Arab captain of the Tel Aviv football team, an Arab deputy speaker of Knesset, an Arab Supreme court justice, and an Arab Miss Israel.

Photo-7It also doesn’t matter that all the way back in 2000, Yasir Arafat refused to accept Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak’s offer to return 94% of the West Bank to the PLO.

It doesn’t matter that Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005, after which Gazans destroyed the infrastructure of greenhouses left behind by the Israelis that could have fed them.

It doesn’t matter that Hamas leaders used their new autonomy to launch missiles against Israeli civilians, while using their own people as human shields in order to win over public opinion.  It doesn’t matter that Hamas embezzled millions in humanitarian aid to build sophisticated terror tunnels under the border to attack Israelis.

It also doesn’t matter that the IDF goes to lengths no other country in the world would ever consider to minimize the collateral damage to Arab civilians, dropping leaflets warning of impending attacks and placing its own soldiers in far greater danger than the rules of warfare require or that make sense from a military point of view.

Instead, the propaganda campaign against Israel goes on, even when the casualties are Palestinians themselves.  Like when a Palestinian girl stabs a Palestinian man whom she mistakenly believed to be Israeli, the headlines scream Palestinian teenager killed by Israeli forces.  And like the 900 workers losing their jobs because the BDS zealots managed to coerce Sodastream to relocate over the green line; it doesn’t matter if a few hundred more martyrs are reduced to poverty if the ideologues can score a PR victory against Israel.

The European community and the Obama administration have ignored these facts and evidence to embrace political correctness and moral equivalence, thereby enabling Palestinian violence against Israeli Jews and prolonging the suffering of Jews and Arabs alike.

No one could say it more clearly or simply than Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu:  “If the Arabs put down their weapons today, there would be no more ‎violence. If the Jews put ‎down their weapons ‎today, there would be no ‎more Israel.‎”

Expanded from an article originally published by Jewish World Review

 

Creating a Culture of Violence

San-Bernardino-vigil-Mark-J.-Terrill-Associated-PressI wish there was no reason to repost this essay.  But with “random” violence becoming a cultural norm, we can’t run away from the root causes of radicalization, whether Muslim or otherwise.  President Obama may not be totally off the mark in his belief that the West created this problem — but our contribution is not what he thinks, and his policies are only adding fuel to the fire.

Zebadiah Carter describes himself living in “an era when homicide kills more people than cancer and the favorite form of suicide is to take a rifle up some tower and keep shooting until the riot squad settles it.” In 1980, this remark by the main character in a Robert Heinlein novel sounded like the science fiction that it was. Now it echoes like a prophecy.

Read the whole article here:
http://yonasongoldson.com/2015/05/18/remembering-the-boston-bombing/

Terrorism Close to Home

Flickr_-_Israel_Defense_Forces_-_The_IDF_Honors_Its_ReservistsThis morning’s terrorist attack by a Palestinian who rammed his car into Israeli soldiers at a bus station struck a little closer to home.  Both of the injured soldiers had just drafted into the army and were friends of my son from the same Lone Soldier group.  They were released on leave a day before my son was, or he probably would have been standing right beside them.

At least one of them will be disabled for months:  the Guardian reports this as “light to moderate” injury.

The story in the Guardian led by stating that the attack took place in the “occupied West Bank,” implying a John-Kerryesque legitimacy, then went on to report that the “incident raises the number of Palestinians killed since 1 October to 98, including an Israeli Arab.”  In the interest of balance, the story did concede that, “More than half of them have been alleged perpetrators of stabbing, shooting and car ramming attacks aimed at Israeli civilians and security forces.”

However, the story neglected to mention that after ramming his car into the crowd, the Arab attacker was shot as he tried to stab one of his victims.

Allegedly.

Not the worst example of media bias by far, but shoddy journalism by any account.  Our children who put themselves in harm’s way to protect others from violence deserve much better.

The Ostrich Mentality

la-fg-israel-palestinians-stabbing-attack-2015-001More unprovoked murders today in Israel: this time the victims included men in the act of prayer.

The approach taken by the Obama administration and much of European leadership, differentiating between terrorism and Islam so not to further alienate the Muslim world, might sound plausible.  But the incontrovertible evidence from Paris, Beirut, and Tel Aviv is that it’s not working.  Ayaan Hirsi Ali makes a case no thinking person can refute.

But, of course, that’s the point:  people aren’t thinking; they’re feeling.  If only the rich and powerful Western nations would humble themselves before the oppressed peoples of the third world, then there would be peace.  If only the intransigent Israelis would stop their illegal occupation, then there would be peace.  If only the culture of white supremacy in America would confess and atone for its evil ways, then there would be peace.

From the United Nations to the European Union to the White House to many of the elite universities around the country, Utopian ideologues bury their heads in the sand and ignore reality so they can persist in their chants of kumbaya and we are the world, reaching out to embrace people who want nothing but to watch the world burn.

In every aspect of our lives we are becoming more confused:  we alienate our friends while we appease enemies who want to kill us; we disdain the blessings we have while chasing shadows in pursuit of happiness; we preach tolerance while attempting to silence all who disagree with us; we dream of a perfect world while we stand idly by and let madmen tear down the world our fathers and grandfathers worked so hard to build.

The chaos of our times didn’t start this week in Paris.  It won’t end there, either, unless we open our eyes and start confronting the moral anarchy that is eating away at the heart of civilization.

The Cost of Voyeurism

violent-imagesWhere were you on Tuesday, August 19th, 2014? That’s the day ISIS terrorists beheaded American journalist James Foley. Or, to be more accurate, that was when they posted the video of their atrocity on YouTube

Did you watch it? If you did, you had plenty of company. According to one poll, an estimated 1.2 million people in Great Britain watched the beheading in just the first few days after the video appeared online. In the United States, pollsters found that 9% of those surveyed had watched the brutal execution, suggesting that about 30 million Americans had witnessed the spectacle by mid-November.

And back in 2004, the video of Islamists beheading freelance repairman Nick Berg was the most popular search topic for a solid week; the al-Qaeda-linked website hosting the video received so much traffic it had to temporarily shut down.

According to Oxford anthropologist Frances Larson, this fascination with violent images is nothing new.

Read more at: http://www.learning-mind.com/voyeurism-violent-images/

The Price of Principle

republican-national-committee-backtracks-after-cringeworthy-attempt-to-honor-rosa-parksEarly last month, Kentucky clerk Kim Davis became the latest standard-bearer of civil disobedience in the face of governmental overreach.  Her refusal to sign marriage certificates for gay couples made her first a hero among traditionalists in an age of moral anarchy, and then a martyr for conservatism when she chose jail time rather than compromise her beliefs.  In the eyes of many, she has become a latter-day Rosa Parks.

Except that she wasn’t.

Let me be clear.  I agree with Ms. Davis in every way:  the Supreme Court decision conjuring up gay marriage as a constitutional right is an offense against moral and legal tradition, a blow against the crumbling integrity of the family structure upon which civilized society depends, and a travesty of jurisprudence.  In his embarrassing decision, Justice Anthony Kennedy didn’t even pretend that his ruling was based in law, but rather on feelings.  In many ways, he himself set the stage for Ms. Davis’s act of rebellion.

But all of that is really beside the point.

The point is this:  Ms. Davis took an oath of office.  If her conscience does not allow her to fulfill her duty, then the principled course of action is to resign.  There are consequences that go with conviction, and in this case the path of conscience requires her to remove herself from her position, not to assert that her personal values prevent her from discharging her duty while insisting that she can keep her job.  That rationale is akin to Lois Lerner claiming innocence and then taking the fifth.  You can’t have it both ways.

In an interview with Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly, Senator Ted Cruz responded to those calling for Ms. Davis to resign by asking, “where have those voices been calling for the Mayor of San Francisco to resign for having made San Francisco a sanctuary city and defied the immigration laws [and] for President Obama to resign — for six in a half year he has defied immigration law, he has defied welfare reform law, he has even defied his own Obamacare…?”

With all due respect, the Senator had it exactly backwards.  By supporting Kim Davis, Senator Cruz undercuts his own objection to President Obama flouting national immigration laws.  If Kim Davis is permitted to pick and choose which laws she follows as a matter of conscience, how is that different from Barack Obama’s failure to enforce legislation his conscience tells him is unjust?

This is what happens when respect for the law gives way before personal ideology, regardless of whether that ideology is right or wrong.  The result is a societal free-for-all, in which individual feelings and sensitivities trump civic order.  My conscience is my own, but it does not permit me to deprive others of their civil rights, no matter how flawed the legal underpinnings of those rights may be.

 

rabbis-talmud-debateNot surprising, there is a talmudic precedent.  On one occasion, the sages of the Sanhedrin, the highest body of Torah legislation, were engaged in an unusually heated debate.  Rabbi Eliezer, the most revered scholar of his time, was unable to convince any of his colleagues to see a particular point of view.  Eventually, he became so frustrated with his fellow scholars that he invoked the name of G-d to support his opinion.

According to tradition, a heavenly voice rang out in the chamber declaring that Rabbi Eliezer was correct in his ruling.

Astonishingly, another sage, Rabbi Yehoshua, stood up and replied, “The Law is not in Heaven.”  Not only were the sages not swayed by Rabbi Eliezer’s demonstration, but the actually expelled him from the High Court.

The talmudic narrative goes on to record that the Almighty, upon hearing that the sages had disregarded the divine endorsement of Rabbi Eliezer, responded that, “My children have defeated Me.”

In other words, once G-d put the system in law in force for His people to follow, even He may not abrogate the dictates of that law.  For once the system of law becomes subject to exceptions, the system will no longer serve its function.

 

20121110-american-constitutionNevertheless, it must also be said that Senator Cruz was not completely off the mark.  If the President of the United States will not uphold the law of the land, if Supreme court justices usurp power over the constitution without the slightest legal pretense to justify their decision, if the Attorney General of the United States will not prosecute local officials or former cabinet officers who show contempt for the law they are sworn to uphold, then why should there be any objection to a county clerk standing up for the tenets of her own religion?

The answer is that wrong behavior does not excuse other wrong behavior.  When mutineers are doing their level best to scuttle the ship of state, when even the captain of the ship cannot be trusted to steer a clear and steady course, the solution is not for the crew to take up their hatchets and begin hacking away at the gunwales.

Ultimately, Kim Davis is just the latest symbol of the spreading disgust with politics as usual.  The real offenders are the highest officials in the land whose conduct promotes personal feelings over responsibility and accountability.  The effects of their civic negligence can be seen in the senseless violence on the streets of Ferguson and Baltimore, and in the surreal ascendancy of Donald Trump.

Personally, I applaud Kim Davis for her conviction and her principles.  But only when all of us — from the chief executive to the most humble civil servant — put respect for the law before our individual predilections, only then will we be able to restore a climate of common purpose to our fragmented society.

Days of Outrage

Palestinian leaders appear to have little control over the actions of the mostly young attackers. – Washington Post, October 13

Anyone who pays attention to history and politics knows that exactly the opposite is true.  Arab leaders have carried on a propaganda campaign to foment violent hatred against Israeli Jews since long before the state of Israel even existed.

In 1929, Arab riots culminated in the Hebron Massacre in which 67 Jews were murdered without provocation.  In 1941, the Mufti of Jerusalem approached Adolf Hitler offering to help bring the Final Solution to the Mideast.  In 1964, Yasser Arafat founded the PLO and began terrorist attacks against Israel — three years before Israel captured the so-called West Bank from Jordan in a war Jordan began.

And, after relinquishing Gaza to Arab control in 2005, Israelis watched from across the new border while Gaza Arabs, incited by the incendiary rhetoric of their leaders, demolished the hydroponic farms left by the Israelis that could have fed communities now increasingly dependent on international aid.

If that weren’t enough, Hamas leaders in Gaza then accused Israel of restraining trade as an excuse to launch rockets into Israel; at the same time, they diverted uncounted millions earmarked for humanitarian relief to build sophisticated tunnels from which to stage terrorist attacks against Israeli civilians.

A Palestinian fighter from the Izz el-Deen al-Qassam Brigades, the armed wing of the Hamas movement, gestures inside an underground tunnel in Gaza August 18, 2014. A rare tour that Hamas granted to a Reuters reporter, photographer and cameraman appeared to be an attempt to dispute Israel's claim that it had demolished all of the Islamist group's border infiltration tunnels in the Gaza war. Picture taken August 18, 2014. REUTERS/Mohammed Salem (GAZA - Tags: POLITICS CONFLICT TPX IMAGES OF THE DAY) - RTR42YJW

So this new intifada has little to do with Israeli provocation or “occupation” and everything to do with Arab leaders eager to create young Arab martyrs so they can continue to hold the reins of power and profit from the suffering of their own people.

“If Palestine were to lay down their guns tomorrow, there would be no war. If Israel were to lay down theirs, there would be no Israel.” – Benjamin Netanyahu

Living Beneath Falling Skies

ap_malaysia_plane_10_kb_140717_4x3_992Two stories from this morning’s headlines:

Man Suing Over Injury From Giant Pine Cone in San Francisco

Missile Brought Down Malaysia Airlines Plane in Ukraine, Investigators Conclude

Our hearts should truly go out to the U.S. Navy veteran who had the misfortune of relaxing in a national park when a 16-pound pine cone fell on his head.  The story would be comical were it not so tragic.  After serving their country, our servicemen deserve respect and appreciation, not traumatic brain injury from freak accidents.

But that’s just the point.  This was an accident, and accidents happen.

I suppose lawyers will wrangle over whether the Park Service was negligent for not posting warning signs and fencing off the area, or for planting a non-native species that might threaten unsuspecting visitors.  I suppose one could also make the case that the Park Service should assume a measure of responsibility by covering the victim’s medical expenses.

But what does it say about us when our natural impulse is to litigate every mishap, to turn to the courts, assign blame, and make others pay?  Life is full of scrapes and bruises, and sometimes more painful twists of fate.  How we deal with the apparent randomness of our world comes down to personal philosophy and theology, but it isn’t always someone else’s fault.

In truth, it reflects a kind of collective arrogance, resulting from the delusion that we are in total control of our lives and our world, and that anything bad that happens to us must have been inflicted in some kind of criminal act.  Why fate smiles on some and torments others is a question we can’t expect to answer in this world.  But there isn’t always a man behind the curtain whom we can haul into court to demand restitution.

Even worse, when we attribute wicked intent to every whim of fortune, we lose some of our contempt for true acts of evil.  The recent finding that it was a Russian-built Buk missile that killed 298 people aboard Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 last year confirms what everyone expected.  There is true evil in the world, and we dare not conflate incidental suffering with that perpetrated by authentic villains.

We live in a world full of contradictions.  When bad things happen to good people, we owe them our comfort and sympathy.  When bad people spread suffering among the innocent, we are duty bound to hunt them down and exact justice.

But we should never confuse the two.

The Virginia Shooting: Nihilism and the Culture of Anarchy

virginia_shooting__3419685b“What has happened to us as a society that we now devalue life to such a level? What has happened in our society that people have become so violent? That’s the fundamental question we need to confront… We have a societal problem in our country.  It reminds us of the most important job any of us will ever have … the job of a mother, a father or a parent.”

Senator Marco Rubio summed it up nicely… or tragically.  But the deeper question is this:  How do we stop the cultural inertia that is driving our society ever further into nihilism and moral anarchy?

Senator Rubio gets the answer perfect:  If it doesn’t start in the home, then there really is no hope for the future.  Without respect for traditional values, without recovering the lost ideals of civility, selflessness, modesty, and integrity, then the tide of history will sweep us away as it did the Roman Empire and leave behind a new Age of Darkness.

Bill O’Reilly makes the same point with his usual brass-knuckled pithiness here.

What is happiness, and how do we get it?

PB Front Cover

Order on Amazon today.

Proverbial Beauty, a new book on how to achieve happiness and success, offers a practical guide to changing our outlooks and our fortunes.  Here’s an excerpt:

In a single, ringing phrase, Thomas Jefferson captured the essence of the American dream when he declared that all men have the right to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” And yet, despite Mr. Jefferson’s noble sentiments and laudable achievements, the enduring lyricism of his words spawned an epidemic of confusion and despondency that continues to spread like pestilence through western society.

How precisely does one pursue happiness? We may pursue wealth, pursue fame, pursue gratification of one form or another. But the fiction of pursuing happiness has become a collective obsession that consumes our lives, either by goading us into chasing impossible dreams or by tarnishing the quality of our existence with unwarranted regrets.

Before we set off in pursuit of anything, we ought to know what it is and how to get it. Like many other words and expressions, we toss about the word “happiness” without really knowing what we mean. The definition seems obvious, but the inconvenient truth is that we really have no idea what we’re talking about.

So what is happiness, and how does one get it?

Read the whole excerpt here:

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0815/Goldson_pursuit_of_happiness.php3